Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

To Lower Or Not To Lower...?
  • THEGREENHORNET
    Posts: 106Expert Adviser
    Im Fighting An Internal Battle, I Want To Keep My 52 Coupe Stock, But That Little Devil On My Shoulder Keeps Whispering In My Ear. Right Now I Have My Motor Out And Very Close To Being Ready To Run. My Question Is It Kosher To Lower My Coupe Or Should I Just Leave It Alone? Im Open To Any And All Opinions. Thanks Guys. -john
  • hudson utah
    Posts: 23Greasemonkey
    I think that lowered is the way to go especially with an air set up, then you can control you ride height. Thats just my opion. The car is cool either way. Hudson Utah
  • rambos_riderambos_ride
    Posts: 3,123Platinum Member
    Brave - posting this question out here on the open forum :p

    Do you have a plan and budget to do the lowering?

    With stock Hudson suspsension you are limited to most of the following...

    Front

    1. Cutting front coil springs - a no, no, if you care about ride/handling at all
    2. Having a shorter spring made with the same spring rate.
    3. Some industrious people have lowering pockets for the front lower control arm - you have to drill out the rivets on the old pocket and attach the new one which effectively lowers the front.
    4. Inserting a FatMan Stub Frame Kit w/MII steering and suspension + air bags - nice $$

    Rear

    1. Remove some leafs - - a no, no, if you care about ride/handling at all
    2. Having new leaf springs made with the same spring rate and a lower arc.
    3. Install lowering blocks - another forum member used 2" blocks and didn't like it dragging all the time. Not sure whether they ended up with 1" or 1"-1/2 blocks...
    4. Re-inforcing and c-notching the rear "frame" to add air bags and 4 link.

    Of course you could always just use a late model frame and section the unibobody over the top of it!

    There's also major considerations on the rear axle pinion angle ~ driveline issues with length and hitting the small tunnel area ~ as well as the panhard bar adjustments when the backend is lowered

    I guess what I'm saying is there isn't an easy inexpensive route to lowering a stepdown and still retain the driveability.

    Of the options listed above I think the least expensive way to do this is to have new springs made - front and rear to lower the car but still retain the original spring rate for handling.

    Since I dropped a 454/TH400 into my 49 and with the change in engine/transmission position (8" rear from stock) and potentially considerable weight change +/- from the original wieght the car was delivered I plan on getting it completely together with a full tank of gas and see where it sits then go from there.

    I want to have the springs and shocks custom made and/or fit to the appropriate weight and handling characteristics I want. My preliminary estimates have been around 1k or under for this style setup.

    I love the look when they sit in the dirt - but In the end my requirements are that my car drives without me having to worry about scraping everytime I run over a pebble on the road or pull into a drive-in to cruise.

    There - I could ramble on some more but really it comes down to money (how much) and do you want the car to handle or look good sitting? (I'm not slamming airbags - you just don't get the same ride)
  • 51ROB
    Posts: 65Senior Contributor
    Hi,

    I Have Lowered My 51 2 Door Sedan. I Did It The Cheap Way For Now, Just To See If I Liked It. I Cut The Front Coil (1 Coil Off). I Also Lowered The Back With Lowering Blocks And Turned The Shock Mount Plates Upside Down, For More Clearance. I Am Happy With It And Later Will Fit Air Bag's. This Is A Cheap Option, Which WILL ALLOW You TO Put Your Car Back If You WANT TO....no Big Dollar Lose..

    Robert-australia
  • faustmbfaustmb
    Posts: 1,105Platinum Member
    I had the same dilema. I did the cheap test to try it out, cut 1 front coil and put 2" blocks in the back. It rides OK for the limited driving that I do. I plan to put 1" lowered springs in the front from http://www.eatonsprings.com/. Their price is good and they claim to have been an OE supplier for Hudson. They will make lowered and stock height springs.



    For the rear, I will replace the 2" blocks with 1" blocks. I feel that 2" is too drastic for otherwise stock suspension.



    I wanted a lowered look with zero modifications, easy and cheap to reverse.



    Matt
  • jsrail
    Posts: 1,534Platinum Member
    Bag it Dude!!!!! I love these things (and most 50's/60's cars) lowered "in the weeds." I'd go the cheap for now to see if you like it, then you're not putting a lot of cash or work into it just to find out you don't like it.

    Me, I'm going with air bags all around so I can cruise the freeway at near stock height, but slam it on the ground in the parking lot on Cruise Nights! But there's going to be little "stock" in my sled.

    Wish someone would make lowered spindles for these things. Maybe as more Huds are hot rodded, Fatmans or someone else will start making them.

    Jay
  • mrsbojiggermrsbojigger
    Posts: 586Platinum Member
    John,
    You're question was making a decision as to whether or not to lower your car. This may sound dumb but if you want to just look at what it might look like being a little lower just throw a couple of concrete blocks or bags of concrete or sand in the trunk. You can back off and look at it and if you don't like it, just take them out. No harm done and you didn't get greasy doing it. Hokey I know but who knows? You may like it lower and then you get out the wrenches.
    Disclaimer: What do I know? :p
    Peace,
    Chaz
    www.themodernartist.com
  • Chris SmithChris Smith
    Posts: 139Expert Adviser
    Get the car on the road and experience the ride before you F it up. IMHO part of the charm of driving a Hudson is the smooth ride it delivers. I have lowered a few cars and they all lost ride quality as a result. The closer you keep it to stock the more resale value it will have. After you get it on the road and you still have the urge to slam it, try and do it in such a way that putting back to stock would be easy. step downs look pretty damn low as is and you will get people asking you if you chopped the roof and lowered it anyway. I say put big sway bars and gas shocks on it to improve the cornering, and any engine power adders bump up the fun factor.
  • bill a
    Posts: 1,570Platinum Member
    keep it stock, spend your money on paint, chrome and upholstery, bill albright
  • Dave53-7C
    Posts: 2,523Platinum Member
    bill a wrote:
    keep it stock, spend your money on paint, chrome and upholstery, bill albright



    Come on Bill, what's wrong with slammin' it to the ground and throwing all of Hudsons engineering out the window? :rolleyes: Maybe installing some skid plates would be in order.
  • nhp1127nhp1127
    Posts: 2,275Platinum Member
    Chris Smith wrote:
    Get the car on the road and experience the ride before you F it up. IMHO part of the charm of driving a Hudson is the smooth ride it delivers. I have lowered a few cars and they all lost ride quality as a result. The closer you keep it to stock the more resale value it will have. After you get it on the road and you still have the urge to slam it, try and do it in such a way that putting back to stock would be easy. step downs look pretty damn low as is and you will get people asking you if you chopped the roof and lowered it anyway. I say put big sway bars and gas shocks on it to improve the cornering, and any engine power adders bump up the fun factor.



    Chris, you are right on! Whatever someone does in this situation needs to be easily reversible and no damage creatd. If you like money and resale value, keep it stock. Niels
  • 52 kahuna52 kahuna
    Posts: 279Gold Member
    I also took the easy (cheap) way out. I cut 1 1/4 rounds off the front springs. It dropped it about 2 1/2 inches. I also put a little shorter (215R75 15's) tire up front. The 60 series tires would have given a little more drop, but showed too much wheel well for my taste.



    Here is a link to a picture so you can see the ride height. I know it's not a coupe, so just cover up the rear portion of the car.



    http://www.chaosgraphics.smugmug.com/gallery/2814757#151272881



    I had lowered the rear using a two inch block, and liked the way it looked, but I am going to try something different in the rear. The rear in the above picture is at stock height.
  • jsrail
    Posts: 1,534Platinum Member
    Ya know Terry, that slight rake looks kinda cool! Maybe its just the surfboards! And even though its not a 2 door, its one I would buy!

    And Neils......who cares about resale? Maybe a consistent builder who sells his cars after they're finished, but not most guys. There are a lot more restored Huds than rodded, so dare to be a little different. :-) And I'd bet that the guy who cares more about resale doesn't have as much fun with his car as the guy who builds with his own personal touch and personality.

    Walt, just do what you want with her and if you have any doubts, looks like the guys here have a few suggestions on how to try it easily and cheap before you permanently decide what to do. Guys have been lowering cars since the 50's maybe earlier too. If you keep it stock, great, and if you want it lowered, great also.

    Jay
    (its too damn hot here already!)
  • 464Saloon
    Posts: 923Platinum Member
    I am planning to go 1 inch. I am going to match up something close out of my Moog catalog (you can do anything with one of these) with a little more rate for the twisties in front and have new leaves with a little more rate for the back made up.
  • nhp1127nhp1127
    Posts: 2,275Platinum Member
    jsrail wrote:
    Ya know Terry, that slight rake looks kinda cool! Maybe its just the surfboards! And even though its not a 2 door, its one I would buy!



    And Neils......who cares about resale? Maybe a consistent builder who sells his cars after they're finished, but not most guys. There are a lot more restored Huds than rodded, so dare to be a little different. :-) And I'd bet that the guy who cares more about resale doesn't have as much fun with his car as the guy who builds with his own personal touch and personality.



    Walt, just do what you want with her and if you have any doubts, looks like the guys here have a few suggestions on how to try it easily and cheap before you permanently decide what to do. Guys have been lowering cars since the 50's maybe earlier too. If you keep it stock, great, and if you want it lowered, great also.



    Jay

    (its too damn hot here already!)



    Hey Jay,



    If your not concerned about resale, let me make some personal touches to your house and see how it effects its value! LOL
  • faustmbfaustmb
    Posts: 1,105Platinum Member
    Opinions are like ... you know. What you do with your car is a personal choice. Of course you need to consider things like budget, resale value, and your long term plans for the car. Whatever you chose to spend your time and money on is up to you. I will always have cars that I can drive without fear of rain and normal wear and tear, so paint and trim is way down my list for any car. I don't have hours to spend polishing and cleaning, and if I did I wouldn't want to. I chose to spend my limited resources making the car safe and reliable to drive. Lower front springs and lowering blocks isn't going to do squat to the resale value. $200 buys a new set of OE spec springs from an OE supplier, Which I'm sure are better that the ones that are 50 + years old.



    Whatever you do, make sure the work is done well and the car is safe to drive. Other than that, make it look and drive how you want.



    I'm not concerned about resale, but that doesn't mean I want a POS.



    Matt
  • `Hudsonator`Hudsonator
    Posts: 858Platinum Member
    faustmb wrote:
    Opinions are like ... you know. What you do with your car is a personal choice. Of course you need to consider things like budget, resale value, and your long term plans for the car. Whatever you chose to spend your time and money on is up to you. I will always have cars that I can drive without fear of rain and normal wear and tear, so paint and trim is way down my list for any car. I don't have hours to spend polishing and cleaning, and if I did I wouldn't want to. I chose to spend my limited resources making the car safe and reliable to drive. Lower front springs and lowering blocks isn't going to do squat to the resale value. $200 buys a new set of OE spec springs from an OE supplier, Which I'm sure are better that the ones that are 50 + years old.



    Whatever you do, make sure the work is done well and the car is safe to drive. Other than that, make it look and drive how you want.



    I'm not concerned about resale, but that doesn't mean I want a POS.



    Matt



    I share this philosophy



    Mark
    Gimme a Hudson, with that "Instant Action"
  • Martin200Martin200
    Posts: 160Gold Member
    Erm... isn't a stock stepdown Hudson low enough as it is? Isn't that why they always chopped and lowered bathtub Mercs, to try to get them to look like a stock Hudson in the first place?



    -Just my two cents worth... if you feel you have to go ahead and modify it, make sure it can be reversed relatively easy. Once the decision is made to restore a car and it becomes a collector's item, they generally last longer than their owners; so the next owner might want a stock car again.
    "Problems are merely opportunities in workclothes." -Henry J. Kaiser
  • pontiac59
    Posts: 56Senior Contributor
    If I had to lower one of these, I'd want to do an air ride setup in the rear at the least.



    It was tight enough changing a rear tire on a bone stock '48 sedan when I saved that one from the scrapper. I'd be afraid you wouldn't be able to do it with lowering blocks in. With the air you could just raise the back up as high as it goes, stick a jack under the axle and go to work.



    Plus with the air if you have to traverse speed bumps, steep driveways, and the like, you can raise the car and not be scraping bottom all the time.





    I have to admit myself that if money was no option, instead of building a custom Hudson, I'd take a rotty parts car and build a street stocker out of it, just for fun.
  • jsrail
    Posts: 1,534Platinum Member
    nhp1127 wrote:
    Hey Jay,

    If your not concerned about resale, let me make some personal touches to your house and see how it effects its value! LOL

    If I was worried about resale, I'd just buy one cheap from a club member and sell it at BJ's! I doubt many club members would be willing to cough up top resale dollars anyway. All talk...no walk! LOL

    If I wanted to worry about resale on a car, I'd spend too much time building it for some unknown future buyer rather than how I wanted the car, and where's the fun in that? There's plenty enough boring Hudsons out there for collectors to buy! LOL Now an Italia would probably bring the most cash stock, but I don't own or want one of those.

    And how much do you think I could really get for a stock '50 Pacemaker Coupe? Probably not anywhere near what I could get for a Kustom. But since I have no interest in selling, resale really means nothing to me. And mine will look very different from the majority of Hudson Coupes, so I like that idea much.

    Geez, I feel better.......haven't had a good contraversy (sp?) in awhile! LOL

    Jay :-)
  • jsrail
    Posts: 1,534Platinum Member
    Martin200 wrote:
    Erm... isn't a stock stepdown Hudson low enough as it is?

    Uh...NO! LOL
  • Aaron D. IL
    Posts: 1,648Platinum Member
    Nothing boring about a Hudson stock or otherwise.
  • THEGREENHORNET
    Posts: 106Expert Adviser
    sweet. i picked a good topic. im really happy with all of the advise. i think i am going to keep it stock, at least for a while to see what its like then i will decide. i should be droping the new motor in this weekend so i will keep you all posted.
  • jsrail
    Posts: 1,534Platinum Member
    THEGREENHORNET wrote:
    sweet. i picked a good topic. im really happy with all of the advise. i think i am going to keep it stock, at least for a while to see what its like then i will decide. i should be droping the new motor in this weekend so i will keep you all posted.

    Cool man! Post some pics when you get that motor in. Really, I just like stirring it up a bit! LOL

    Jay
  • hudsonkid
    Posts: 2,298Platinum Member
    Lower it.



    Keep it hudson powered, how cool would that be?
  • Birdman
    Posts: 92Expert Adviser
    Remember that your chosen wheel/tire combination could provide 2-3 inches of lowering.
  • 51ROB
    Posts: 65Senior Contributor
    Sure You Wont Lower It??? Also Used 195/70/15 Tyres On The Front And 195/60/15 On The Rear..
    hud1_11812031831002869.jpg
    640 x 427 - 70K
  • nhp1127nhp1127
    Posts: 2,275Platinum Member
    jsrail wrote:
    If I was worried about resale, I'd just buy one cheap from a club member and sell it at BJ's! I doubt many club members would be willing to cough up top resale dollars anyway. All talk...no walk! LOL



    If I wanted to worry about resale on a car, I'd spend too much time building it for some unknown future buyer rather than how I wanted the car, and where's the fun in that? There's plenty enough boring Hudsons out there for collectors to buy! LOL Now an Italia would probably bring the most cash stock, but I don't own or want one of those.



    And how much do you think I could really get for a stock '50 Pacemaker Coupe? Probably not anywhere near what I could get for a Kustom. But since I have no interest in selling, resale really means nothing to me. And mine will look very different from the majority of Hudson Coupes, so I like that idea much.



    Geez, I feel better.......haven't had a good contraversy (sp?) in awhile! LOL



    Jay :-)



    Jay,



    While you are misguided and the heat has gone to your head, your still ok.LOL
  • THEGREENHORNET
    Posts: 106Expert Adviser
    we will see real soon. ill keep you updated as how the transplant is going in the coming days. -john
  • hornet53hornet53
    Posts: 403Platinum Member
    51ROB wrote:
    Sure You Wont Lower It??? Also Used 195/70/15 Tyres On The Front And 195/60/15 On The Rear..



    That's what I'm eventually planning on doing once I find a wheel that looks good on a stepdown. except I'm planning on a smaller wheel in back i.e. 20" 200 spoke wires in front with 18" wires out back. Who'll be able to tell?





    BTW, the wire wheels seem to be the only thing I can find that look good on a stepdown, but I don't want to clean them.
    1953 Hornet sedan Twin-H
    Custom front springs, drop-blocks out back, Clifford 6-2 headers exiting out back shotgun style, Pertronix, and Flames!

    1964 Chevy C-10 Longbed, 396/TH400 lowered just enough and \"easy to touch up\" Black paint.

    2003 Ford Crown Victoria Police Interceptor
    Caved in quarter and fender. Bad paint. Non-True-Trac heap. But it's paid for.
  • jsrail
    Posts: 1,534Platinum Member
    nhp1127 wrote:
    Jay,

    While you are misguided and the heat has gone to your head, your still ok.LOL

    Touche Neils! LOL!!!!
  • hudsoncustomhudsoncustom
    Posts: 151Expert Adviser
    Build the car the way YOU want it. I couldn't give a crap about who might own it next....I build cars for me.



    Besides, Hudsons look WAY better lower...



    HPIM1394.jpg
  • TwinHTwinH
    Posts: 536Platinum Member
    Lower. Just put 1 1/2" blocks on this week. I wish todays "bolt-ons" were

    half as easy as these. I used a"scientifically engineered" "Jet Stream-

    Super Cushion" rubber lowering block kit. We're headed to Ohio in a couple

    weeks and between the blocks and the wifes luggage we should be in

    tail draggin territory. I let you know how it goes.



    Hudson022.jpg



    Hudson023.jpg



    Hudson015.jpg
  • hudson utah
    Posts: 23Greasemonkey
    I like the drop down's stock and they do already look lowered chopped etc. but bagged gets you down there!.... It really depends on your ride preferance. I had a bagged s10 it road had with like 0 psi but like a caddy with 50/60 % full and like a dump truck almost full of air.... that's just my experience..... Hudson
  • hudson utah
    Posts: 23Greasemonkey
    it road hard (sloppy i meant) with almost no air and like a caddy at half to three quarters full, an now at full rides like a dump truck
  • jsrail
    Posts: 1,534Platinum Member
    hudson utah wrote:
    it road hard (sloppy i meant) with almost no air and like a caddy at half to three quarters full, an now at full rides like a dump truck

    I thought you weren't supposed to run bags full anyway. But my thought was to run mine slightly lower than stock height with the bags set at optimum ride (for normal driving) and set them at ant height for parking lot cruising. I believe you can get the system that have 2-3 settings so you just hit a button to change ride height. Anyone ever use Air Ride's Shockwaves in the rear? Supposed to give some shock absorbtion with the air bag. More money than regular bags, but you don't need additional shocks.