Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Categories
- All Discussions27,051
- Orphaned Marques
- ↳ Hudson21,121
- ↳ Street Rods807
- ↳ Off Topic573
- ↳ American Motors149
- ↳ Kaiser - Frazer70
- ↳ Nash70
- ↳ Packard163
- ↳ Studebaker122
- Classic American Cars
- ↳ Ford Motor Company956
- ↳ Chrysler Corporation477
- ↳ GM Corporation1,396
- ↳ Post War Chevrolets75
- ↳ Pontiac Forum119
- General
- ↳ All makes1,959
- ↳ Poll Discussions24
- Swapmeets & Events
- ↳ Events130
- ↳ Swapmeets108
- Hot Rod Corner
- ↳ Ford Rods90
- ↳ Lead Sleds67
- Special Interest Groups
- ↳ The Flathead Forum139
- European marques
- ↳ MG Car Company2
- ↳ Mercedes-Benz2
In this Discussion
- nhp1127 June 2006
- Robert Conner June 2006
A nice Review of Cars...
-
A nice Review of Cars outta my local rag...
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/movies/273246_cars09q.html -
Dang!
First thing out of the Seattle P.I., that I've ever agreed with!
I guess that miracles do happen, after all.
-
I read a review done by Roger Ebert. He like the movie aswell. He lamented about how a Studebaker should have been in the movie aswell and how a Studebaker Hawk would have kept the Hudson Hornet humble. I guess he must know of some secret Studebaker racing record that no one knows about. Plus, the Hawks came out after the last stepdowns. I like Stude's and I'm glad he is a car guy but please, lets stay with the facts!
