Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Categories
- All Discussions27,072
- Orphaned Marques
- ↳ Hudson21,139
- ↳ Street Rods807
- ↳ Off Topic574
- ↳ American Motors149
- ↳ Kaiser - Frazer70
- ↳ Nash70
- ↳ Packard163
- ↳ Studebaker122
- Classic American Cars
- ↳ Ford Motor Company956
- ↳ Chrysler Corporation477
- ↳ GM Corporation1,396
- ↳ Post War Chevrolets75
- ↳ Pontiac Forum119
- General
- ↳ All makes1,962
- ↳ Poll Discussions24
- Swapmeets & Events
- ↳ Events130
- ↳ Swapmeets108
- Hot Rod Corner
- ↳ Ford Rods90
- ↳ Lead Sleds67
- Special Interest Groups
- ↳ The Flathead Forum139
- European marques
- ↳ MG Car Company2
- ↳ Mercedes-Benz2
In this Discussion
- Browniepetersen September 2012
- dave s September 2012
- faustmb September 2012
- hudsonsoul September 2012
- hudsonsplasher1 September 2012
- hudsontech September 2012
- Jon B September 2012
- joycescheetz September 2012
- junkcarfann September 2012
- Marconi September 2012
- RL Chilton September 2012
- ski4life65 August 2012
- Terraplane33 September 2012
- terraplane8 September 2012
- Uncle Josh August 2012
1936 Hudson Terraplane
-
You'll find the '36 is a very nice car to drive with very good handling, steering and brakes. With the engine in 100% condition with good compression it will have plenty of hill-flattening power too, relatively speaking.
-
Hope the same is true for the '37 because that is what I am picking up a week from Sunday 8->
-
1936 models had teething problems - a lot were ironed out in the 1937 models. Better steering and suspension come to mind.
Hudsonly,
Alex Burr
Memphis, TN
-
Alex, I haven't driven a '36 and '37 back to back so it would be interesting to hear what the differences are in the driving experience.
