Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

'57 Plymouth unearthed from time capsule in OK.
  • Ken U-Tx
    Posts: 1,104Platinum Member
    This may a bit off topic, but if you are wondering what a car looks like after being removed from a concrete vault time capsule after 50 years , this is the place to find out : http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070616/ap_on_re_us/buried_belvedere



    Folks with visions of seeing a pristine '57 Plymouth being lifted out of the vault were probably shocked. The concrete was not sealed to keep the ground water out......the results were quite disgusting to see.......but the pictures show it in all it's deplorable glory....enjoy! Ken U in TX
  • bigboy308
    Posts: 117Expert Adviser
    Jeeezzz- They had Boyd Coddington try to start it? Hell, he can't start the stuff that his shop thows together on his TV Show!! Cars they build arent any good 'til he has a try @ burning the tires off!!
  • hudsontechhudsontech
    Posts: 4,044Platinum Member
    Complete story @ http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070616/ap_on_re_us/buried_belvedere



    Figure whoever wins it will put it up on ebay - starting bid $25,000 or so. hehehehe



    Hudsonly,

    Alex Burr
  • Steve E.
    Posts: 520Platinum Member
    $200.00 42 yrs ago was too much to pay for one!
  • SamJSamJ
    Posts: 1,405Platinum Member
    The girls appear to be much better preserved than the car...:D



    Thanks for the link, Ken...
    HETfortyqtpi@earthlink.net (drop the HET)

  • 66patrick6666patrick66
    Posts: 1,831Platinum Member
    Geez, Steve, don't like Mopars, huh?
    "The time has come", the Walrus said, "to speak of many things. Of shoes and ships and sealing wax, of cabbages and kings. And why the sea is boiling hot,
    And whether pigs have wings..."
  • Steve E.
    Posts: 520Platinum Member
    Nuttn wrong with mopars in general, but 57 thru about 61s were terrible,tinny,lousy quality control, etc. Drivetrains were O.K. held up much better than the bodies!
  • gearhead
    Posts: 164Gold Member
    boyd ran home and started to make a plymouth out of a hudson, it was a little less rusty,not much
    DSC02291_118218076248061.JPG
    640 x 480 - 60K
  • Chris SmithChris Smith
    Posts: 139Expert Adviser
    The egyptians, the Myans, the Aztecs, Peruvians ect all did a better job of preserving artifacts than the gomers that buried that car. What the hell were they thinking? Looks more like they built a bomb resistant cess pool. The city councel and ancestors of the grave diggers must be proud. LOL
  • jsrail
    Posts: 1,534Platinum Member
    Steve E. wrote:
    Nuttn wrong with mopars in general, but 57 thru about 61s were terrible,tinny,lousy quality control, etc. Drivetrains were O.K. held up much better than the bodies!

    Guess I'm lucky to have gotten a '56 Dodge! Cuttin it kinda close though! lol
  • 66patrick6666patrick66
    Posts: 1,831Platinum Member
    Let's not forget, 1957 through 1960 EVERYTHING tended to rust the second they were driven out the plant door!!! Notice how few of ALL makes you see from then?
    "The time has come", the Walrus said, "to speak of many things. Of shoes and ships and sealing wax, of cabbages and kings. And why the sea is boiling hot,
    And whether pigs have wings..."
  • hudsonkid
    Posts: 2,298Platinum Member
    66patrick66 wrote:
    Let's not forget, 1957 through 1960 EVERYTHING tended to rust the second they were driven out the plant door!!! Notice how few of ALL makes you see from then?



    I see a lot of 1957 chevys....



    usually at least one per car show. sometimes two.
  • hudsondad
    Posts: 491Platinum Member
    hudsonkid wrote:
    I see a lot of 1957 chevys....



    usually at least one per car show. sometimes two.



    Certainly in the 1957 era, GM cars have the highest survival rate, and for very good reasons. Body wise they were the best, and mechanically superior to anything else. 1955-1960 Mopars were gone from the used car scene in 10 years, Fords weren't much better as their engines were Junk (Y-blocks and big blocks). From Chevy to BOP to Cadillac, GM had some of their best years. If you ever drove a 57 Plymouth, beyond the forward styling look, they were Cheap, Tinny and Crude. How many other 55-57 cars have to have their own class at car shows? Generally only Chevy's. I usually skip them, because I get tired of looking at all these Chevy's, but it's a fact.
  • Jay G
    Posts: 177Gold Member
    What do you want? You can make your own 55-57 any time you want just pick up a catalog....everything is there. In addition to my 3 Hudsons I have a 60 Dodge Matador and you are right on the rust. It will rust in just sitting covered in Southern California where it never rains. But you got to love the cross ram manifolds....and fins?



    Jay
  • Steve E.
    Posts: 520Platinum Member
    Yeah, 56 was a pretty nice car and one of the BETTER looking Dodges.
  • 66patrick6666patrick66
    Posts: 1,831Platinum Member
    The Tri-Five Chevys don't get a second look from me, unless they are exceptional. I'll walk over to a late '50s anything-but-GM at a car show, regardless of condition, long before I'll go to the GM cars.
    "The time has come", the Walrus said, "to speak of many things. Of shoes and ships and sealing wax, of cabbages and kings. And why the sea is boiling hot,
    And whether pigs have wings..."
  • Hudsonrules
    Posts: 398Platinum Member
    :( To bad for the'57 plymouth that was buried for 50 years. I have seen cars from the twenties that have been sitting out in the desert for sixtyor seventy years that look to be in better shape.I like Mopars but the Plymouths and Dodges of that period began rusting with the first rain and if they were in a rain pron climate, there was not much left after five or so years. They were nice looking cars but lacked in quality. Tri five chevies are nice and parts are readily available. They were good mechanicaly as well. To bad Chevie or Ford are unable or unwilling to build comparable cars today. I drove a Hudson when those cars were plentiful and cheap and I still drive a Hudson, I just knew quality then and still appreciate it. Plus when I have taken my Hudson to a car show, even though it is a driver, it attracts more attention than the trailer queen Chevies. It is to bad about the'57 Plymouth, I wonder how a '57 Hudson would have held up. Thanks for letting me ramble.