Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Categories
- All Discussions27,064
- Orphaned Marques
- ↳ Hudson21,133
- ↳ Street Rods807
- ↳ Off Topic574
- ↳ American Motors149
- ↳ Kaiser - Frazer70
- ↳ Nash70
- ↳ Packard163
- ↳ Studebaker122
- Classic American Cars
- ↳ Ford Motor Company956
- ↳ Chrysler Corporation477
- ↳ GM Corporation1,396
- ↳ Post War Chevrolets75
- ↳ Pontiac Forum119
- General
- ↳ All makes1,960
- ↳ Poll Discussions24
- Swapmeets & Events
- ↳ Events130
- ↳ Swapmeets108
- Hot Rod Corner
- ↳ Ford Rods90
- ↳ Lead Sleds67
- Special Interest Groups
- ↳ The Flathead Forum139
- European marques
- ↳ MG Car Company2
- ↳ Mercedes-Benz2
In this Discussion
- James_B February 28
1940 Chevrolet Convertible - puzzler...
-
I am going to take my chances here and ask a question that no one has yet to tackle and answer.
Everyone knows that the 1940 Chevrolet was a one year only car. But, people also know that convertible models had reinforced frames but void of an X brace as with other cars of that era.
In 1940, they put under the Cabriolet (convertible) the craziest of chassis designs and wonder why? It was a one year, one car only chassis and made no sense by design, which was waaay overbuilt Kind of a H / KV / X design with a large square steel place on the under side only covering the various legs-brace junction.
GM had available to them any number of standard X brace designs and they even used it on the following 1941 model year Chevy Convertible.
So, was there a reason for this oddity? Was is experimental or some test? It is not mentioned in brochures nor shop manuals. Never shown in detail anywhere except for one shim chart I saw which was in a bulletin. Outside of that it remains a mystery and almost like they were hiding it's existence for some reason. :-/ :-?
Does anyone dare to answer this? If you need visual examples I can post. Thanks!
Jim
-
Was checking back to see if anyone answered this? Thanks.