Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

1934 Hudson 8 cyl sedan.
  • Huddy42Huddy42
    Posts: 1,000Platinum Member
    This is a shot of our old 1934 Hudson 8 cyl sedan which was at the car show last weekend, I restored this car back in the 70's and first put it on the road February 1981, it has just change hands and the new owner is as proud a punch, the car has served two previous owners since we sold the car 20 years ago, it looks just as good today as it did when I sold it.
    P7100006_2011-08-27.JPG
    800 x 600 - 62K
  • Huddy42Huddy42
    Posts: 1,000Platinum Member
    This should be right this time. 1934 Hudson 8 cylinder sedan.
    IMG_0191.JPG
    800 x 534 - 58K
  • PAULARGETYPEPAULARGETYPE
    Posts: 1,238Platinum Member
    YOU MEAN LIKE THIS ONE TOO
    34HUDSONAD.jpg
    607 x 800 - 100K
    79aed5dd192cc49738a31d5e1.jpg
    160 x 120 - 5K
  • Park_WPark_W
    Posts: 2,051Platinum Member
    But why doesn't it look like a '34 sedan ???
  • oldhudsonsoldhudsons
    Posts: 1,725Platinum Member
    Park - because it's a RAILTON sports tourer, LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • MikeWAMikeWA
    Posts: 1,440Platinum Member
    And everyone says sedans are stodgy. . . :lol:
  • hudsonsoulhudsonsoul
    Posts: 234Gold Member
    Great looking car. Love the Railton's... cannot wait to see one in person again in less than a month.
  • 46HudsonPU46HudsonPU
    Posts: 5,146Moderator
    Hi folks -

    It was a bit confusing, so I 'merged' the two threads 'Huddy42' created on this into one, so now you can actually see the correct picture (34 Hudson 8 cyl sedan) without going to the second thread.

    :blink:

    P.S. I love the looks of that Railton too - must have 'hurt' to sell it...
  • Huddy42Huddy42
    Posts: 1,000Platinum Member
    It's not hard for us Aussie's to confuse people .LOL