Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

Rotary Vane pump can be a problem
  • Park_WPark_W
    Posts: 2,052Platinum Member
    FYI, folks: I've been battling a fuel delivery-rate problem with my '47 C8 for some time now. After several tests and corrective measures to eliminate other possible sources of the problem, with only partial success, I've finaly found the heart of the problem ... a restriction in the fuel line. And the restriction is the Carter rotary vane electric fuel pump. It works great to fill the carb before starting, etc. But when it's not running, it's a significant restriction to flow. Try blowing through one. I had thought the pump design had enough clearance in the vane and housing structure to allow the main pump to draw through it with no problem. Not the case. I measured suction at the tank with and without the elec. pump in the line. Vacuum reading with the pump removed was twice that with the pump in the line.



    My planned solution is to install a bypass line around the elec. pump, with a check valve in the bypass so the engine pump can draw through the bypass line, but when the elec. pump is on, the added pressure will close the check valve so the elec. pump isn't merely pumping fuel in a circle, around the bypass loop. I've fould a nice brass check valve with 1/4" pipe connections for less than $10. Will post the results here when I get it installed.
  • ScottScott
    Posts: 371Platinum Member
    Park,



    I experienced the same thing with the pump I bought from Fifth Avenue. I mounted it in-line by the gas tank. The car ran fine when it was on, but turn it off and the car would quit. I called and talked to Randy and these pumps are made to run all the time like a new car.

    When I put one on my 36 Terraplane, I did as you suggested, and put in a by-pass line with a check valve to keep it from pumping back into the tank, so now I can turn it off. These are great pumps and last forever.
  • aminardaminard
    Posts: 87Senior Contributor
    I'm just curious, what do you guys have against eliminating the engine mounted fuel pump and running the electric pump full time?



    Allan
  • Hudson308Hudson308
    Posts: 1,405Platinum Member
    aminard wrote:
    I'm just curious, what do you guys have against eliminating the engine mounted fuel pump and running the electric pump full time?



    Allan



    That's exactly what I've done, with great results for the last ten years using the same pump. A couple diaphragm (electric) pumps in the same location near the tank only lasted a year or two each. The lack of a mechanical pump doesn't look stock when you open the hood, but then neither does the rest of my engine.
    Workin Stiff
  • Park_WPark_W
    Posts: 2,052Platinum Member
    Scott, thanks for the confirmation that the "check-valve bypass" works the solution OK. Allan, I just wanted it to look original under the hood.
  • royerroyer
    Posts: 998Platinum Member
    Other than having it crank longer before the engine starts, why have an electric pump?
  • jjbubaboyjjbubaboy
    Posts: 568Platinum Member
    Hey Matt,

    The advantages I have found are not only to fill the regular pump after sitting, but in case the regular one quits you can get home with the electric, and its also a great cure if you have any vapor lock issues.

    Jeff
  • SuperDaveSuperDave
    Posts: 2,377Platinum Member
    Running both pumps at the time runs the risk of the mechanical pump diaphram failing and the electric pump will dilute the engine oil and cause bearing failure. It's your car..gamble if you choose.
  • Essex4Essex4
    Posts: 117Expert Adviser
    The Carter/Federal-Mogul rotary vane pumps are, and NEVER were intended to be used as a booster pump for a STOCK mechanical fuel pump!! It's all, or nothing with these, as the stock mechanical pump will not pull gas through the rotary vane pump when it is turned off.



    See the attached JPG scan of the installation instructions... this subject is specifically addressed in both the "Important Notice" box at the top of the sheet, as well as the main body of the instructions.



    I have found these pumps to be the most trouble free electric fuel pumps currently on the market when correctly installed. The biggest advantage is they are not effected by any of the fuel additives, or alcohol that is blended in today's gas which can ruin the diaphragm type pumps. The motor is also cooled by the fuel itself while it is running which adds greatly to the life-span of these pumps.



    I personally ran one of these for more than 20.000 miles on my '46 Hudson Pickup before I sold it, and never had a single problem, but you must remove, or bypass the original mechanical pump.



    The attached instruction sheet does tell you how you can leave the original pump on the engine which may be preferred if you have a double action pump that boosts the vacuum for the wipers, by plugging the outlet, and bypassing it.



    Dad, (53Jetman) will most likely chime in here on this subject, as we have been running one of these pumps on his Super Jet for many trouble free miles as well.



    Hope this helps answer some of these questions! These pumps are an excellent product!!
    scanA_126050123049659.jpg
    279 x 438 - 93K
    scan0002F_126050536349659.jpg
    425 x 284 - 95K
    scan0001B_126050724349659.jpg
    580 x 237 - 96K
    Dave Bean
    HET Club
    Essex 4 Registry
    Manager
  • 53jetman53jetman
    Posts: 873Platinum Member
    Hudson308 wrote:
    That's exactly what I've done, with great results for the last ten years using the same pump. A couple diaphragm (electric) pumps in the same location near the tank only lasted a year or two each. The lack of a mechanical pump doesn't look stock when you open the hood, but then neither does the rest of my engine.



    I too have had the rotary vain pump installed on my Super Jet for at least eight years with no problems. I don't even have a mechanical pump on the engine any more - just put a plate over the mounting hole in the block.



    Jerry

    53jetman
    Jerry
    email: HudsonJetman@mail.com
    2nd Generation Hud-Nut
    HET Tech Adviser on Hudson Jets 1953 & 1954
    HET Registrar of all Hudson Jets
  • Geoff C., N.Z.Geoff C., N.Z.
    Posts: 2,270Platinum Member
    I concur that if the diaphragm in your mechanical pump fails, you must by-pass it, otherwise you will pump fuel into the crankcase., if you have an electric pump back further. I carry a flexible fuel line with fittings that will screw into the inlet and outlet pipes after disconnecting these off the mechanical pump. Have only had to use it once. My experience of electric fuel pumps is such that I don;t trust them that much, but I*'m talking about Lucas models, so the ones referred to should be much better. However, the Carter mechanical fuel pumps seem to have notoriously leaky vlaves which let the fuel drain back after about three days, so an auxilary electric pump overcomes that.

    Geoff.
    If you're stuck in a hole, stop digging.
  • RonSRonS
    Posts: 611Platinum Member
    Park,I had a parrelel fuel line in my hornet until recently. The fuel line branched off after a common filter. One line went to the AC mech pump,the other to a E8011 solenoid pump(Airtex). The two lines met , with a tee, after the AC outlet and resume as a single line to the carbs. Both pumps have check valves. I switched to a Carter P60430 and ran the line through the AC pump along with the vacuum line and removed the cam arm. Can't tell that the mech pump is a dummy. I was concerned with the old system, that gas could get into the crankcase. The elec pump can't pump gas into the engine cause the hole is blocked. No more fuel starving in Arizona summers.
  • 46HudsonPU46HudsonPU
    Posts: 5,152Moderator
    Where did you get the check valves? Do you have a source, part no. for it?
  • ScottScott
    Posts: 371Platinum Member
    http://www.mcmaster.com/# Is where I got my check valves.
  • Park_WPark_W
    Posts: 2,052Platinum Member
    Geoff, my bypass line is around the electric pump, so it won't be a hindrance to flow when it's not running. Ron, I've thought about the diaphragm failure issue and pumping gas into the crankcase, but figure that's a low-probability event. Worth considering though. Your dummy pump idea is a good way to work the "original look" issue (unless one has a dual pump and wants to retain the vacuum pump function). I'm getting my check valve from McMaster-Carr also. Using the one with female 1/4" pipe threads at both ends, and only 1/3 psi needed to open the valve. Price is about $12.
  • RonSRonS
    Posts: 611Platinum Member
    The original mech pump has check valves already,and so do any electrical ones.However, due to the elec pump location in the rear,Napa sells various inline check valves. Just go to Napa on line, and seek inline fuel line check valves.While there, check out vacuum storage tanks. They fit nicely on the right fender liner and are about the size of a softball. Need the one with 2 vacuum ports(in & out from the wipers). The tank can be removed in a minute. Cost $13.
  • Park_WPark_W
    Posts: 2,052Platinum Member
    Ron, I think the Carter rotary vane pump doesn't have check valves. Or valves of any sort. No need for them in that type pump.



    Here's what I got from NAPA online on the check valves: "We're sorry, but no matching products were found for "inline fuel line check valve". " Pretty much what I've come to expect there. Not that they don't have the item, but that the search tool is often worthless in finding it.
  • RonSRonS
    Posts: 611Platinum Member
    Park, I stand corrected it was Summit racing parts.The one I like is the Carter G1691002 -$21.40. And your right about Napa they have a online, but it's usless as ...on a bull. They want you to go to the store. You can't even browse if you don't have a specific modern car in mind.
  • Turbopackman
    Posts: 177Gold Member
    RonS wrote:
    Park,I had a parrelel fuel line in my hornet until recently. The fuel line branched off after a common filter. One line went to the AC mech pump,the other to a E8011 solenoid pump(Airtex). The two lines met , with a tee, after the AC outlet and resume as a single line to the carbs. Both pumps have check valves. I switched to a Carter P60430 and ran the line through the AC pump along with the vacuum line and removed the cam arm. Can't tell that the mech pump is a dummy. I was concerned with the old system, that gas could get into the crankcase. The elec pump can't pump gas into the engine cause the hole is blocked. No more fuel starving in Arizona summers.



    That's exactly what a friend of mine did on his '41 Packard. You can't tell the difference from original and every looks stock. He did install a flat block off plate between the pump and the block to ensure that no fuel can get into the crankcase in case something inside the mechanical pump decides to leak.



    Personally, I dumped the mechanical pump altogether and went with an electric fuel pump with a block off plate on the block. You can't go wrong with it and the whole thing looks so much cleaner now. But again, I'm not 100% originality minded, either.
  • Park_WPark_W
    Posts: 2,052Platinum Member
    Here's the finished installation.
    Pump bypass-sm_126059510746409.JPG
    540 x 341 - 29K
  • RichieRichie
    Posts: 904Platinum Member
    Sweet looking setup Park, I like that. Richie.
  • RonSRonS
    Posts: 611Platinum Member
    Park,nice job, is the check valve the Carter that I spoke of before? Where did you get it?
  • 53jetman53jetman
    Posts: 873Platinum Member
    Park W wrote:
    Here's the finished installation.



    Park - I'm surprised that you are using copper line. I've been told by someone smarter than I that we should convert our fuel lines to steel, or stainless steel.



    Jerry

    53jetman
    Jerry
    email: HudsonJetman@mail.com
    2nd Generation Hud-Nut
    HET Tech Adviser on Hudson Jets 1953 & 1954
    HET Registrar of all Hudson Jets
  • Park_WPark_W
    Posts: 2,052Platinum Member
    Jerry, I'm not aware of any reason to drop the use of copper tubing. Maybe I've missed something. It's sure a lot easier to work with (sharp bends, etc.) than steel pipe.



    Ron, that's the $12.50 valve from McMaster-Carr. Only 1/3 psi to unseat it in the forward direction, says the spec. I've not taken it out for a proof test run yet (too darned cold today!)
  • onerare39onerare39
    Posts: 528Hitchhiker
    Very very nice installation Park.



    John



    P.S. McMaster Carr has a lots and lots of great stuff, it's the first place I look when I need something that I can't find something locally.
  • mjsandbemjsandbe
    Posts: 340Platinum Member
    When I bought my car it came with an electronic fuel pump in addition to the mechanical pump. Is there an easy way to tell just by looking at it to tell the style?



    It does not seem to restrict flow when not turned on, but I have noticed my oil thinning like some gas is getting in.
    IMG_2768-1_126072966852976.jpg
    1024 x 683 - 86K
    [b]Michael S.[/b]
    Chronicles of my search for and adventures with my Hornet http://52hornet.blogspot.com
  • Park_WPark_W
    Posts: 2,052Platinum Member
    I think it's safe to say that any "click-click" pump has built-in check valves in order to work properly, so shouldn't cause any flow restriction problems. If the fuel seems to be getting thinned and you're using the electric pump sometimes, that could indeed indicate you've got a bad diaphragm in the engine's mechanical pump (And if you don't think a leaky diaphragm can be trouble, I hope your wife isn't of child-bearing age!)
  • RonSRonS
    Posts: 611Platinum Member
    I 'm interested in installing a check valve. I like the ones at Mcmaster-Carr. I want to place it in line with the pressure regulator. Should I put the regulator first in series, or the check valve? By the way, Michael, that is a solenoid type pump, probably by Airtex. Gas will pass through it when off, with little restriction, but when they fail they they block the flow and even though the motor hums, nothing passes. Reliability is spotty, I am told.
  • Park_WPark_W
    Posts: 2,052Platinum Member
    Ron, what's the nature of your installation, and objective of the check valve ? That might dictate where the check valve would go.
  • RonSRonS
    Posts: 611Platinum Member
    Park, Right now, I have an elec (gear driven)pump by the gas tank and a straight run to the carbs with only a pressure reg in between. The regulator is just behind the cowl support Where the fuel line begins its' rise to the engine compartment..out of sight of engine and chassis judges. When the engine shuts down I would like to cut down on the liklihood of a long travel for gas to be pushed to the carbs. Especially when restarted after only a few hours. My thought, by placing a check valve before the reg, fuel will "crack open " the valve quicker and enter the reg to reduce pressure to the carbs(6-7 psi without a reg). Mcmaster-carr has just the right valve to thread into the regulator.
  • Park_WPark_W
    Posts: 2,052Platinum Member
    Well, after a few days of yucky weather, I took advantage of a sunny day to finally run a proof test of the electric pump check-valve bypass arrangement. It seems to have eliminated the restriction problem. Ran the ol' (but "new engined") C8 out on I-77 and ran it up to 75 mph, accelerating and climbing a bit of a hill. Nary a hint of fuel starvation. So at long last, all is well.
  • ScottScott
    Posts: 371Platinum Member
    Congrats Park,

    I know how you feel, when I first got my 51 Com 8 on the road I would get about a mile from home and the engine would quit. I would flip on the fuel pump and it would run for a little while and quit again. I finally figured out the pump was the restriction. I parked next to you at the Nationals in the black 51 Com 8.

    I did the exact same thing with a check valve when I put another pump in my 36 Terraplane. It seems to work OK, but I haven't road tested it yet.
  • RonSRonS
    Posts: 611Platinum Member
    Put a check valve on my hornet this week as well. Park, I installed the 1 psi cracking valve from Mcmaster-carr, female inlet, male outlet, into the 1/8npt pressure reg. Ran great and after 4 days fired right up and again after sitting 3 hours instantly started. the gas is staying up in the line now. Need to wait to the Arizona summer to verify elimination of fuel starvation. Ron
  • aminardaminard
    Posts: 87Senior Contributor
    does anyone know what type of fuel pump/part number this is in post # 26. I would like to ass one to my car.



    Allan
  • super-sixsuper-six
    Posts: 214Gold Member
    aminard wrote:
    does anyone know what type of fuel pump/part number this is in post # 26. I would like to ass one to my car.



    Allan

    It looks similar to mine, which is:

    Advance Auto Parts- Master fuel pump-elec. Pulse 6-volt-E8011.
    PhotobucketLarry
  • RonSRonS
    Posts: 611Platinum Member
    If the car is still 6v than you looking at an E-8011 style. Probably made by Airtex. 12v is E-8012. In my experience these can be hit & miss in reliability. They are not as restrictive in line as a gear driven (Carator) pump but I have had one fail causing it to motor with no fuel delivery, Please read some of the responses prior. If you wish to add a electric pump there are alot of processes needed to be acomplished. I dumped the mech pump. It's there in looks only.
  • aminardaminard
    Posts: 87Senior Contributor
    RonS - are there still block plates available to purchase to cover the hole? I am not opposed to removing the mechanical pump entirely.



    Allan
  • Hudson308Hudson308
    Posts: 1,405Platinum Member
    aminard wrote:
    RonS - are there still block plates available to purchase to cover the hole? I am not opposed to removing the mechanical pump entirely.



    Allan



    Yep.

    Same one as an early Chrysler hemi.

    And flathead Ford.

    And big block Chev.



    Early hemi sounds the best at the parts counter, though... :D
    Workin Stiff
  • RonSRonS
    Posts: 611Platinum Member
    Actually, I never removed the Mech pump, AC dual action that is. In order to keep the appearance as original I removed the AC took off the actuating arm and placed a piece of sheet aluminumin the stack of gasket shims, cutting the alum to match the gaskets. The metal alum plate is second behind the gasket which is against the block. Vacuum for wipers is as original, but the gas goes in the pump then out. The fuel diaphram was altered internally to remain rigid, as not to flex as fuel pressure passes through. Down side, up hill or full throttle wipers behave as if the car has the Carter fuel pump, ie,no dual action. That is remidied with a vacuum tank for @$13.
  • ESSX28-1ESSX28-1
    Posts: 995Platinum Member
    RonS wrote:
    Actually, I never removed the Mech pump, AC dual action that is. In order to keep the appearance as original I removed the AC took off the actuating arm and placed a piece of sheet aluminumin the stack of gasket shims, cutting the alum to match the gaskets. The metal alum plate is second behind the gasket which is against the block. Vacuum for wipers is as original, but the gas goes in the pump then out. The fuel diaphram was altered internally to remain rigid, as not to flex as fuel pressure passes through. Down side, up hill or full throttle wipers behave as if the car has the Carter fuel pump, ie,no dual action. That is remidied with a vacuum tank for @$13.



    What volume vacuum tank works for you?
    Dave Y
    New Zealand
  • RonSRonS
    Posts: 611Platinum Member
    I purchased a 4"( 10cm) diameter round black plastic type with two nipples,ie, an inlet and outlet. I tried it. It worked in the garage"test" but never permanently installed it. It doesn't rain enough in Arizona. The wipers work fine unless you floor it or are climbing a steep grade.
  • Richard in Florida
    Posts: 1Hitchhiker
    Park W wrote:
    I'm getting my check valve from McMaster-Carr also. Using the one with female 1/4" pipe threads at both ends, and only 1/3 psi needed to open the valve. Price is about $12.



    I realize your post is very old, but if you read this one, would you please let me know WHICH check valve you used? I went to the McMaster-Carr sight, and there are a million valves.



    If you would, reach me at FlatHat@comcast.net.